Lady Henevere
Lovin' The Homestead
The media is reporting that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of Monsanto, allowing GMO alfalfa to be planted before an environmental impact report can be completed.
One story: http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/22/business/la-fi-court-monsanto-20100622
The court's opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/09-475.pdf
But there may be some good news. While the media is touting this as a Monsanto victory (since the ban on test-planting of the GMO alfalfa was lifted), within the nuances of the opinion itself it may not be so bad. While limited test plantings may go forward, there still must be an environmental impact report before GMO alfalfa is widely used. And more importantly,
Apparently Monsanto got a little giddy before actually reading the opinion. According to that same article, Monsanto released a statement saying,
Hopefully this ruling will provide some solid legal ground to fight back against GMO foods. It may also be yet another reason to buy organic -- the more organic farms out there, the more damaging cross-contamination will be, and the less GMO products will be seen as "harmless."
One story: http://articles.latimes.com/2010/jun/22/business/la-fi-court-monsanto-20100622
The court's opinion: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/09pdf/09-475.pdf
But there may be some good news. While the media is touting this as a Monsanto victory (since the ban on test-planting of the GMO alfalfa was lifted), within the nuances of the opinion itself it may not be so bad. While limited test plantings may go forward, there still must be an environmental impact report before GMO alfalfa is widely used. And more importantly,
(Quote from http://civileats.com/2010/06/21/supreme-court’s-ruling-on-monsanto’s-ge-alfalfa-who-won/ )...the Supreme Court has also now ruled for the very first time that environmental harm includes economic effects such as reduced agricultural yield or loss of market due to genetic contamination, as well as the concept of what biologists refer to as gene flow (in practice, the idea that genetically engineered material may get into conventional plants through cross-pollination). The Supreme Court now accepts that this phenomenon in and of itself is harmful and illegal under current environment protections.
Thats a huge win for our side Thats gigantic! Michael Hansen, senior staff scientist of Consumers Union, told me. Future lawsuits can now confidently use the gene-flow argument against approval and use of genetically engineered crops.
Others share his glee. The Center for Food Safety called the ruling a victory for the Center for Food Safety and the farmers and consumers it represents.
Apparently Monsanto got a little giddy before actually reading the opinion. According to that same article, Monsanto released a statement saying,
That statement does not reflect reality in any way. Now the statement on Monsanto's website is more accurate, saying they have no idea when the impact report will be complete, and until then GMO alfalfa cannot be planted by farmers. http://www.monsanto.com/roundupreadyalfalfa/This is exceptionally good news received in time for the next planting season. Farmers have been waiting to hear this for quite some time. We have Roundup Ready alfalfa seed ready to deliver and await USDA guidance on its release. Our goal is to have everything in place for growers to plant in fall 2010.
Hopefully this ruling will provide some solid legal ground to fight back against GMO foods. It may also be yet another reason to buy organic -- the more organic farms out there, the more damaging cross-contamination will be, and the less GMO products will be seen as "harmless."