Icu4dzs said:
To make things worse, the closer one gets to retirement, the more "issues" that begin to show and aggressive folks generally try to take advantage of a worker nearer to retirement in an effort to "save the company money". Hopefully (for both of you) he is "vested" and his retirement is assured or his anxiety level could go "to the roof" if he feels that the retirement for which he has worked so long could be jeopardized.
Sorry but as I said, this is a gov't job, not private sector. In gov't jobs (this kind, anyhow, and it is the same in both US and Canada), the longer you've been there and the closer to retirement, the LESS you have to do. He is un-fireable short of gross malfeasance, and retirement benefits are generous and guaranteed (and he will max them out ~6 yrs from now, although will presumably keep working beyond that since mortgage still has 11+ yrs to go).
I apologize for the long, wordy posts, but things like this are not solved with "one-liners" or diatribes about those who attempt to be helpful.
Yeah, but neither are they solved by trying to psychoanalize the deeper motives of individuals
whom you've never encountered in
any way shape or form... nor are they solved by leaping to conclusions in the absence of the necessary information.
I appreciate your helpful intentions, but it just doesn't help much to be "submitting" digressive and generally-far-off-the-mark conclusions on things about you can't possibly know aobut one way or the other.
Whereas many of the "one-liners" you disparage HAVE actually been quite valuable
And anyhow, I was asking about how to RAISE THE KIDS (a topic you have generally avoided other than to second another post's suggestions),
not what-all you're going on about.
Thank you for your concern for my husband,
Pat