FarmerJamie said:
Britesea said:
Those small companies didn't HAVE to sell to the larger ones. If you have investors and shares you are vulnerable to a hostile takeover; but if you own your business outright and it is successful, how can someone like Con Agra force you to sell your business to them? It seems to me that the small businesses that sold out were just as lazy and greedy as everyone else.... Is there something I am missing here?
Not trying to argue, but really?

From my economic classes, the primary function of business is to increase shareholder wealth that's it.
Unless there are specific patents involved, I don't think there is much preventing anyone from starting up their own venture for their own business. Anyone can start a company with the mission to break even and provide jobs, but I question how long the business would last.
Totally hear you on the "primary function of business", however I think the general belief is that people who start these types of businesses have other goals in mind such as providing a better product than is generally available.
Most small business entrepreneurs get into business because it allows them to do what they love, and get paid for it. They soon find out that they need to work on the business more than the "what they love" that got them into it in the first place. It is selling out, and most people who sell would say so.
(I've owned my own small business since 1999 and regularly network with other small business owners.)