Beekissed said:
I would suspect the same is true for you
Nope. If I yearned to live elsewhere, I'd take the necessary steps to live there. If Iived in the city and yearned to have acreage, I'd sell my house in the city and buy or rent in the country. Life is short and waiting until some distant point in the future where you will be able to finally afford to move seems silly to me....particularly if I was paying $20 for a chicken and I really just wanted to be able to raise my own.
Life for me has many dimensions, and some of the things in my life that are important to me are my proximity to family and life-long friends who might as well be family. I also value the fact that my kids won't have to pay living expenses to go to university like I did--I had to work two jobs to get through school, they can live at home and actually save some money which is important to me.
People have different priorities and that's okay. It's also okay to wonder how folks can afford this or that when you cannot. Thats called a discussion. Like when city folks say they'd never live in a place that didn't have cell reception or where the nearest fast food or Walmart is 50 miles away and they think people are crazy to live there.
I think your view of "city people" might be a tad skewed to what you want it to be. Just because people live in a city, doesn't mean their values are different than yours.
Yes, it's a discussion--but it's always good to take good manners into account when using words like "ridiculous" to describe the "suckers" who apparently "have money to burn".