Tallman said:
patandchickens said:
It seems to me that it depends a WHOLE lot on whether better estimates are AVAILABLE.
They may not be.
If they're not, I don't think there is much room for criticism.
Pat
True - but does that mean that we start throwing our taxpayer dollars in just any direction? I don't think that good decisions can be made knowing that our information contains "significant margins of error."
So perhaps you would rather they just do nothing... which is fine... but a reasonable argument can also be made that it would be a good idea to do at least SOMEthing (not necessarily what they're actually doing, mind you, but not just sitting there one one's hands going la-la-la-la-la).
People make decisions on estimates containing significant margins of error ALL THE TIME in real life. Heck, there are significant margins of error in weather forecasting but you still make decisions about what to do next weekend that take the forecast into account; unless you don't invest at all, you are certainly basing your decisions on stuff with significant margins of error; even just deciding what to plant in the garden to give you enough food for the next year contains significant margins of error. But that doesn't mean that we don't go ahead and MAKE those decisions anyhow, and act on them.
Pat