a. There is No Right to Consume or Feed Children Any Particular
Food. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
b. There is No Generalized Right to Bodily and Physical Health. 26
c. There is No Fundamental Right to Freedom of Contract.. . . . 27
A only counts depending on politics. I mean, you can feed your kids **** as long as it's not straight from the toilet, as far as I can tell. It's only when you go healthy and off the grid the law gets called on
I'd think A would be akin to some doctors suing parents for neglect if they feed their children vegetarian?
B makes sense... we all know we don't own our bodies. That's fundamental in society.
C is pretty silly. Everytime you exchange cash for goods, that's a contract. *rolls eyes*
Although they're right... people have been regulating diet forever. The Bible might not be the most accurate document, but the strict rules of diet were how things were.
This is all part of living in a society. Humans can't be trusted to have self-responsibility. That's a fact, proven over thousands of years of history. Then again, my cure is anarchy, chaos, and a few good plagues.
eta: we're all rebels here. I bet just being on boards like this gets you marked on a govvie rebel flow chart some where.
