hikerchick said:
Being smart and doing research are not the same as having credentials. I guess my question is what qualifies this guy as an expert who apparently is smarter than the established medical community, made up of people who, if I am not mistaken, are also smart and have also done research and who have also spent many years in medical school?
What is his degree in? Where does he get his expertise?
Hi hikerchick,
I think I'm picking up what you're putting down here. First, I'll admit that I haven't seen the movie "Fat Head" but I'm somewhat familiar with it and have read a lot of the reviews and commentary. I made a radical change in my own eating habits years ago and raise my children in accordance with the whole, traditional foods way of eating which is largely along the lines of the Weston A. Price way of doing things.
I've done a lot of research and reading over the years, and also have a background in healthcare. First of all, I can tell you that, having worked with MD/PhD students and physicians, their training in nutrition is very minimal. Even when they go the double doc route which can take 10 years depending on the area, they can get one class in nutrition. So they are by no means experts in nutrition. Also, having the research background, and having done bench research and healthcare/academic research myself, Big Pharma does come in a wines and dines them with gifts both big and small and the names of drugs on pens and pads of papers plays a large role in those drugs that end up being prescribed.
In terms of hard and fast data being done, we can look at the research scientists. Mary Enig, Ph.D., who someone has already mentioned, is well respected and world renowned. She is a nutritionist and biochemist who got her degree from the University of Maryland -- a far cry from a comedian! Her book which is often referenced is: "Know Your Fats: The Complete Primer for Understanding Fats, Oils, and Cholesterol." Dr. Enig also wrote: "Eat Fat, Lose Fat." Weston Price was a dentist who traveled to various the world, studied various cultures and documented his findings. His class books is "Nutrition and Physical Degeneration." If you do a PubMed or Medline search, you will find that there are many credible sources who are working in bariatrics, cardiology, or lipid research who support much of what is said here. It's not "popular" or pc because it contradicts much of mainstream thought, but that doesn't make it wrong.
When you delve deeper into some of the politics of food, we find a lot of things that are shocking, but not necessarily surprising. Not too long ago, the FDA admitted that they supported the popular "pro-soy" advertisements without requiring the soy industry to back it up with adequate research that they would normally require, so now they're (quietly) back tracking. There's a lot of damage to be undone. They've made this big push for the use of vegetable oil. They recommended using canola oil -- and, excuse me but what is a canola?? I won't touch the stuff, personally. For some reason they demonized the real traditional foods and we can't help but wonder why is all... I render beef suet and use coconut oil liberally. Cultured butter rocks! And lard is good for us. All stuff they told us was evil has been proven to be good for us by the real experts.